For example, William Afton (2023) is responsible for the death of Jane Schmidt, however she was a greedy person who wanted to keep custody of Abby to collect some type of pension or insurance, incriminating Mike by ordering Jeff and his gang to destroy the pizzeria.
Of course these types of acts are not redemptive because the pe kill other villains for pragmatic or personal reasons, nothing moral.
As you know, these types of villains are usually hate sinks but they hardly pass the baseline but there are cases that do manage to be atrocious enough to be considered at least IH
What type of crimes would make them stand out and some examples?
Pure evil whose meh attentive against another villain who has redeemed himself or scapegoat
@ScandaXD I may never have had it, and if I had, maybe they eliminated it because Steppen had a fan base.
Unalaq since at least it has three-dimensional writing (although they hate it for being one-dimensional), contrary to those that are only made to be proposed as cm in vfw
ps: everyone is scrappy except steppenwolf (although his dceu version has an article in loathsome characters wiki)
There are some pure evils that managed to kill people but were later reversed by making it a zero kill count, for example darkrai or even an ih like bowser
What is the explanation?
61 Votes in Poll
There was confusion in my previous post about lotso
Some agree that he only passes the baseline because he lets Andy's toys die in the incinerator.
That's why I said that his crime of starting a dictatorship in sunnyside is not heinous and he probably suffers from fridge horror
Also his version of the original script lacks that meh because he redeemed himself
His crime of starting a dictatorship where toys that are not perfect are left with children who play roughly with them as a way of venting their anger. Isn't heinous?
Does he suffer from fridge horror?
He is very egotistical, showing no care for anyone but himself, not even caring about his own children.
This line from your article seems more like a vfw character created solely to be cm and then be eliminated for that
I just needed to say that William was an evil, cruel, ruthless being and a lot of terms related to evil accumulated in his description.
76 Votes in Poll
Pure evil villains who have only killed one person, you could remove that death and they would be a zero kill count pure evil
Examples: Frollo and Dr. Facilier
The one who only sees his lover with lust or disposable sexual object
Mention a pe that is sympathetic to the public even though it was not intended to do so; it does not have to be a hate sink, it simply generates involuntary sympathy.
Do not mention pe with tragic and three-dimensional writing as that would imply that the sympathy was intentional.
What are the criteria for an unseen villain to be pure evil and if he never physically appeared
I mean that they never appear physically and we only have an image of them or their physical appearance is unknown since that would imply not being sufficiently characterized.
since the man in the woods does not have an image in his profile in pe and vf unlike characters like afton, ozai and diavolo who we do not see for much of the story but the heroes have had their presence
55 Votes in Poll
If a villain hung out with people who were a bad influence and who exposed his true colors and as time goes by instead of moving away from them he decides to stay with them to the point that the villain's actions are his and he stays with them as a way of evade responsibility for their actions
Could it be a form of fake tragic of those villains who were exposed to forces that brought out their true colors?
In the articles these pure evils are compared to the joker
In the case of Bullseye, he is compared to the Joker because of his fake tragic status because he has an ambiguous excuse that contradicts himself because he gives different versions of his past.
And in Chucky he is compared due to his relationship with Tiffany and Harley Quinn respectively since they both abused them and do not feel genuine love.